Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 June 20233304467

Decoy Tavern Public House, Beccles Road, Fritton, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR31 9AB

Demolition of Public house and replacement with five new dwellings to include a new access and pathway

Authority
Great Yarmouth Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wallace J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the facilities offered by the Decoy Tavern should be retained to serve the needs of the local community
  • the effect on the character and appearance of the area including the effect on a non-designated heritage asset
  • the effect on the living conditions of future occupants with particular regard to outdoor amenity space

What decided it

The complete and permanent loss of the non-designated heritage asset without adequate justification, combined with the failure to demonstrate the public house was no longer viable and the inadequate outdoor amenity space for future occupants, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan with no material considerations of sufficient weight to overcome this.

The benefits of housing delivery, economic benefits, provision of a footpath and biodiversity enhancements were outweighed by the unjustified loss of a non-designated heritage asset, the failure to retain a community facility, and inadequate living conditions for future occupants.

Framework references: 203, 130

Plan policies cited: CS Policy CS15, LPP2 Policy C1, CS Policy CS3, CS Policy CS9, CS Policy CS10, LPP2 Policy E5, LPP2 Policy A2, LPP2 Policy A1, CS Policy CS2, LPP2 Policy H4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.