Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 November 20223305473

164-166 VAUXHALL BRIDGE RD , LONDON, SW1V 2RA

described on the application form as ‘temporary decorative scaffold shroud advert printed onto PVC and comprising a 1;1 image of the building facade with an inset area for advertising and information measuring 9.8 metres x 6.6 metres

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Not Applicable
Inspector
Simpson L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed advertisement shroud on amenity, with regard to the effect on the host building and the surrounding area, including the character and appearance of the Vincent Square Conservation Area and the effect on the setting of the Lillington and Longmoore Gardens Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed advertisement would introduce a large, prominent advertisement in a sensitive conservation area location that is at odds with the prevailing character of the upper storeys and would be visually harmful to the character and appearance of the Conservation Areas.

Plan policies cited: Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 43

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.