Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 March 20233306662

Elms Farm , Bassingfield Lane, Bassingfield , NG12 2LG

Authority
Rushcliffe Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Martinson P
Postcode
NG12 2LG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial weight to be given to Green Belt harm (inappropriateness and loss of openness) combined with significant harm to character and appearance was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, such that very special circumstances do not exist.

Framework references: 147, 148, 149, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy 4 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy (2014), Policy 21 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2: Land and Planning Policies (2019), Policy 10 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 1, Policy 1 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.