Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 June 20266004544

137 Melton Road, Stanton on the Wolds, NG12 5PJ

Planning appeal 6004544 at 137 Melton Road, Stanton on the Wolds, NG12 5PJ (Rushcliffe) was dismissed on 9 June 2026 by Inspector Chris Baxter, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

erection of a single-storey detached dwelling with access, parking and landscaping

Authority
Rushcliffe
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Chris Baxter
Postcode
NG12 5PJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • Whether the proposal is suitably located
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations and whether this would amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would have a significant spatial and visual impact on openness, and the minimal self-build benefits do not clearly outweigh this harm or the other identified harms to location and character.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 21 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2Policy 3 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 1Paragraph 3.10 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2Policy 10 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 1Policy 1 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 142Paragraph 153

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rushcliffe

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed6 October 20266002873
    Land At Main Street, Flintham, NG23 5LA
  2. Allowed2 October 20266010392
    144 Browns Lane, Stanton on the Wolds, NG12 5BN
  3. Allowed1 June 20266005540
    200 Melton Road, Stanton on the Wolds, NG12 5BP
  4. Allowed5 May 20266006419
    78 Cropwell Road, Radcliffe On Trent, Nottinghamshire, NG12 2JG
  5. Dismissed12 February 20266001587
    Land at Thoroton Road, Thoroton, Nottinghamshire, NG13 9DT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.