Planning appeal decision
Land At Main Street, Flintham, NG23 5LA
Planning appeal 6002873 at Land At Main Street, Flintham, NG23 5LA (Rushcliffe) was dismissed on 6 October 2026, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the evidence robustly demonstrates a local need for the proposed rural exception development and whether the proposal would comply with the Framework's definition of rural exception sites, with regard to the size of the proposal.
a rural exception development, including full planning permission for 14 affordable dwellings including 6 discount market sales dwellings with associated provision of car parking, open space, landscape, access and infrastructure works, and outline planning permission for 3 enabling self-build market dwelling plots
- Authority
- Rushcliffe
- Appeal type
- major · Planning
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- NG23 5LA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the evidence robustly demonstrates a local need for the proposed rural exception development and whether the proposal would comply with the Framework's definition of rural exception sites, with regard to the size of the proposal
- whether the appeal site is an acceptable location for the proposal, with regard to the spatial strategy and the accessibility of services and facilities
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding countryside, and trees which are subject to a Tree Preservation Order (TPO), and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Flintham Conservation Area (FCA) and whether it would comply with the Design Code
- the effect of the proposal on bats, a protected species
What decided it
The substantial weight given to the benefits of the scheme did not outweigh the substantial weight given to the harm to the significance of the Flintham Conservation Area and the other identified harms, so the proposal failed the exceptional circumstances test in Framework Policy S5.
the substantial weight ascribed to the proposal's benefits (affordable housing, self-build provision and other benefits) did not outweigh the substantial weight ascribed to the harm to the FCA's significance and the other identified harms, so the appeal was dismissed
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS Policy 8CS Policy 3CS Policy 14CS Policy 10CS Policy 11CS Policy CS1LPP2 Policy 13LPP2 Policy 22LPP2 Policy 34LPP2 Policy 37LPP2 Policy 38LPP2 Policy 28
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Policy S3Policy S5Policy HO10Policy HE6Policy HE9Policy N2Policy N3Policy DP3Policy HO7
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rushcliffe
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed2 October 20266010392144 Browns Lane, Stanton on the Wolds, NG12 5BN
- Dismissed9 June 20266004544137 Melton Road, Stanton on the Wolds, NG12 5PJ
- Dismissed12 February 20266001587Land at Thoroton Road, Thoroton, Nottinghamshire, NG13 9DT
- Dismissed16 April 20253359613Land South Of Hillcrest Bridegate Lane , Hickling Pastures, Nottinghamshire, LE14 5LA
- Allowed5 July 20243333187Land Between Old Rectory And Rectory Bungalow Station Road, Elton on the Hill, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG13 9LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®