Planning appeal decision
Six Bells Inn, High Street, Gislingham, Eye, IP23 8JD
Planning appeal 3306727 at Six Bells Inn, High Street, Gislingham, Eye, IP23 8JD (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 25 May 2023 by Inspector Berry A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the provision of community facilities in the area, having regard to the site comprising an Asset of Community Value.
applying for change of use of the Six Bells Inn Gislingham from public house to veterinary practice and pet supplies (sui generis). Business proposed to exist on the ground floor level whilst retaining the existing ancillary residential accommodation on the first floor of the building
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Major retail and services
- Inspector
- Berry A
- Postcode
- IP23 8JD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the provision of community facilities in the area, having regard to the site comprising an Asset of Community Value
What decided it
The loss of a valued community facility, an Asset of Community Value, with no alternative provision in the village and no adequate evidence of unviability, causes substantial harm that significantly and demonstrably outweighs the limited benefits of the proposed veterinary practice.
the substantial harm from the loss of a valued community facility and reduction in the community's ability to meet its day-to-day needs significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited employment benefits of the proposed veterinary practice
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 93
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed15 October 20266012038The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
- Dismissed14 September 202660102811 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
- Dismissed8 September 20266010228Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
- Dismissed2 September 20263359620Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
- Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®