Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 May 20233306727

Six Bells Inn, High Street, Gislingham, Eye, IP23 8JD

Planning appeal 3306727 at Six Bells Inn, High Street, Gislingham, Eye, IP23 8JD (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 25 May 2023 by Inspector Berry A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the provision of community facilities in the area, having regard to the site comprising an Asset of Community Value.

applying for change of use of the Six Bells Inn Gislingham from public house to veterinary practice and pet supplies (sui generis). Business proposed to exist on the ground floor level whilst retaining the existing ancillary residential accommodation on the first floor of the building

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Major retail and services
Inspector
Berry A
Postcode
IP23 8JD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the provision of community facilities in the area, having regard to the site comprising an Asset of Community Value

What decided it

The loss of a valued community facility, an Asset of Community Value, with no alternative provision in the village and no adequate evidence of unviability, causes substantial harm that significantly and demonstrably outweighs the limited benefits of the proposed veterinary practice.

the substantial harm from the loss of a valued community facility and reduction in the community's ability to meet its day-to-day needs significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited employment benefits of the proposed veterinary practice

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 93

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

5 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266012038
    The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
  2. Dismissed14 September 20266010281
    1 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
  3. Dismissed8 September 20266010228
    Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
  4. Dismissed2 September 20263359620
    Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278
    Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.