Planning appeal decision
Chestnut Caravan Park, Steppingley Road Tingrith, Milton Keynes, MK17 9FG
Planning appeal 3307038 at Chestnut Caravan Park, Steppingley Road Tingrith, Milton Keynes, MK17 9FG (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 8 November 2023 by Inspector Owen A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS) and relevant development plan policies.
4 additional caravan plots for static caravans and towing caravans
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Owen A
- Postcode
- MK17 9FG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS) and relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the development on openness
- whether the site is suitably located with respect to its access to services and facilities by sustainable modes of transport
- the effect of the proposal on the Greensand Ridge Nature Improvement Area (NIA)
- whether the site is suitably located with respect to living conditions for its future residents with respect to noise, foul water drainage and amenity space
- would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by virtue of inappropriateness, combined with failures to support sustainable modes of travel and provide acceptable living conditions, was not clearly outweighed by unmet need for Gypsy and Traveller accommodation or the appellant's personal and family circumstances.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy HQ1Policy SP7Policy CC8Policy H7Policy EE8
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed15 October 20266009682Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
- Dismissed9 October 2026601067023A High Street North, Dunstable, LU6 1HX
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®