Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 June 20233307476

152 Eastcote Road, Ruislip, Middlesex, HA4 8DX

proposed glazed infill side extension and replacement cladding

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Walker R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property, a non-designated heritage asset
  • The living conditions of the occupiers of Nos 150 and 154 Eastcote Road with particular reference to overlooking

What decided it

The cumulative harmful effects on the character and appearance of the non-designated heritage asset, combined with adverse impacts on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through overlooking, were unacceptable and conflicted with the development plan.

Framework references: 203

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1, Policy HE1, Policy DMHB3, Policy DMHB11, Policy DMHB12, Policy DMHD1, Policy HC1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.