Planning appeal decision
Land at Courtwood Farm, Court Hill, Fordingbridge, SP6 1QD
Planning appeal 3309233 at Land at Courtwood Farm, Court Hill, Fordingbridge, SP6 1QD (New Forest District Council) was dismissed on 25 July 2023 by Inspector Leonard S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for the appeal scheme having regard to: (a) the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; and (b) the potential for future occupants to access services and facilities through means other than by use of cars.
erection of 5 new build houses with associated landscaping
- Authority
- New Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Leonard S
- Postcode
- SP6 1QD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is a suitable location for the appeal scheme having regard to: (a) the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; and (b) the potential for future occupants to access services and facilities through means other than by use of cars
- the effect of the proposal on the integrity of European Protected Sites (EPS)
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the incongruously urbanising scale and layout of the development in a rural location, combined with the unsustainable location requiring heavy dependence on private car use, outweighs the modest housing supply benefits even under the tilted balance.
The modest housing benefits and economic benefits of the development were afforded moderate weight, but the significant harm to character and appearance and the conflict with sustainable development objectives, including the unsustainable location and failure to promote walking, cycling and public transport use, significantly and demonstrably outweighed these benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ENV3Policy ENV4Policy STR1Policy STR3Policy STR4Policy STR5Policy HOU5Policy CS21
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 105Paragraph 174Paragraph 84Paragraph 85Paragraph 78Paragraph 60Paragraph 69Paragraph 8
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in New Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed2 July 20266001075Ss6 Land East of Lower Pennington Lane, Pennington, Lymington, SO41 8AL
- Dismissed29 May 202660037901 Duncan Road, New Milton, BH25 5AW
- Dismissed28 May 20266002232Land Rear of Kona, Sway Road, Lymington, SO41 8LR
- Dismissed21 May 20263369784Little Nutley, Ringwood Road, Sopley, BH23 7BB
- Allowed29 April 20266005105Land at New Lane, Milford-on-Sea, SO41 0UQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®