Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 July 20233309233

Land at COURTWOOD FARM, COURT HILL, Fordingbridge, SP6 1QD

erection of 5 new build houses with associated landscaping

Authority
New Forest District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Leonard S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is a suitable location for the appeal scheme having regard to: (a) the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; and (b) the potential for future occupants to access services and facilities through means other than by use of cars
  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of European Protected Sites (EPS)

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the incongruously urbanising scale and layout of the development in a rural location, combined with the unsustainable location requiring heavy dependence on private car use, outweighs the modest housing supply benefits even under the tilted balance.

The modest housing benefits and economic benefits of the development were afforded moderate weight, but the significant harm to character and appearance and the conflict with sustainable development objectives, including the unsustainable location and failure to promote walking, cycling and public transport use, significantly and demonstrably outweighed these benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 105, 174, 84, 85, 78, 60, 69, 8

Plan policies cited: Policy ENV3, Policy ENV4, Policy STR1, Policy STR3, Policy STR4, Policy STR5, Policy HOU5, Policy CS21

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.