Planning appeal decision
Land West of Yapton Lane, Walberton
Planning appeal 3309365 at Land West of Yapton Lane, Walberton (Arun District Council) was allowed on 5 April 2023 by Inspector Mageean A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and on the Barnham to Walberton settlement Gap.
outline planning application with all matters reserved, other than means of access, for the construction of up to 48 dwellings (30% affordable homes) and dental/doctors' surgery (Use Class E (e))
- Authority
- Arun District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Mageean A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside, and on the Barnham to Walberton settlement Gap
- The implications of the loss of Grade 1 agricultural land
- Accepting that the Council is unable to demonstrate a five year supply of housing land, the significance of the shortfall
- The consistency or otherwise of the proposal with the development plan taken as a whole, and whether any conflict and harm arising would be outweighed by other material considerations
What decided it
The acute and persistent shortfall in the Council's five-year housing land supply, engaging the paragraph 11(d) tilted balance, meant the substantial benefits of housing delivery outweighed the moderate and modest harms identified.
The substantial weight attached to market and affordable housing delivery, together with moderate and modest weight for other social, economic and environmental benefits, outweighed the moderate weight given to conflicts with countryside, settlement gap, agricultural land and design policies and the low-level less-than-substantial heritage harm, such that adverse effects did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy C SP1NP Policy HP1Policy D SP1Policy D DM1Policy SD SP3Policy SO DM1Policy AH SP2Policy INF SP1Policy H DM1NP Policy HP6Policy ECC SP2Policy QE DM3Policy M9 (West Sussex Joint Minerals Local Plan)NP Policy VE13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 14Paragraph 57Paragraph 130Paragraph 174Paragraph 200Paragraph 202Paragraph 219
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Arun District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed14 August 20266003625Land West of Brook Lane and South of A259, Angmering, Angmering, BN16 3JL
- Allowed5 August 20266003864HM Ford Open Prison, Ford Road, Ford, BN18 0BX
- Dismissed17 April 20263374471Land South of Ancton Lane, Middleton-on-Sea, PO22 6NB
- Planning permission granted2 March 2026336050527 North Ham Road, Littlehampton, BN17 7AS
- Allowed24 December 20253368245Land to the North of Lake Lane, Barnham, West Sussex, PO22 0AJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®