Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 April 20263374471

Land South of Ancton Lane, Middleton-on-Sea, PO22 6NB

Planning appeal 3374471 at Land South of Ancton Lane, Middleton-on-Sea, PO22 6NB (Arun District Council) was dismissed on 17 April 2026 by Inspector McGlone A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would accord with the spatial strategy in the development plan.

the demolition of agricultural buildings and development of the site to provide 67 No. dwellings with supporting infrastructure, storage units, public open space, landscaping, sustainable urban drainage, car and cycle parking and associated works

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
McGlone A
Postcode
PO22 6NB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would accord with the spatial strategy in the development plan
  • the effect of the proposed development on the Grade II listed buildings of Manor Farmhouse and Ancton House Hotel, and the non-designated heritage assets (NDHA) of Ancton Manor Historical Farmstead, Ancton Barn, Ancton Farm, Cottage Barn and Flint wall / Former Farmstead
  • the proposal's effect on flooding and whether the proposed development would make adequate drainage provision
  • the effect of the proposal on the provision of Best and Most Versatile (BMV) Agricultural Land
  • whether occupiers of the proposed development would have reasonable access to shops, facilities and services
  • the effect of the proposed development's layout on a protected tree
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing, BNG, secondary school education transport, improvements to the A259 Comet Corner junction, local highway improvement works, a travel plan and a range of monitoring fees

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Grade II listed Manor Farmhouse and Ancton House Hotel was not outweighed by the public benefits, providing a strong reason for refusal.

The substantial benefits of market and affordable housing delivery, together with other moderate/limited benefits, did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the designated heritage assets, to which great weight was given, so the balance tipped against the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SD SP1aPolicy SD SP2Policy C SP1Policy HER SP1Policy HER DM1Policy HER DM2Policy SO DM1Policy W SP1Policy W DM1Policy W DM2Policy W DM3Policy ECC SP1Policy T DM1Policy ENV DM4Policy AH SP2Policy T SP1Policy INF SP1Policy INF SP2Policy ENV DM5Policy OSR DM1NP Policy MOS1NP Policy MOS7NP Policy MOS2NP Policy MOS3NP Policy MOS4NP Policy MOS6NP Policy MOS10NP Policy MOS14NP Policy MOS5NP Policy MOS17
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 78Paragraph 187Paragraph 170Paragraph 173Paragraph 174Paragraph 175Paragraph 177Paragraph 178Paragraph 179Paragraph 181Paragraph 136Paragraph 63Paragraph 64Paragraph 65Paragraph 66Paragraph 100Paragraph 115Paragraph 118Paragraph 58
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Arun District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed14 August 20266003625
    Land West of Brook Lane and South of A259, Angmering, Angmering, BN16 3JL
  2. Allowed5 August 20266003864
    HM Ford Open Prison, Ford Road, Ford, BN18 0BX
  3. Allowed24 December 20253368245
    Land to the North of Lake Lane, Barnham, West Sussex, PO22 0AJ
  4. Dismissed17 December 20253371832
    Longacre, The Street, Walberton, West Sussex, BN18 0PY
  5. Allowed4 December 20253369419
    Land West of Bewley Road, Angmering , BN16 4LJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.