®Planning appeal decision
67 Mill Lane, LONDON, NW6 1NB
the erection of part single, part two storey rear extension and conversion of ground floor retail store room (Class E) to provide a 2-bedroom flat (Class C3)
- Authority
- London Borough of Camden
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Lancaster K
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to light, outlook and provision of internal accommodation
- Whether a legal agreement to prevent occupiers from applying for car parking permits is necessary
What decided it
The cumulative harm to character and appearance, inadequate living conditions for future occupiers, and absence of a binding legal agreement to secure car-free housing status meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan with no material considerations to outweigh that conflict.
Framework references: 11, 130
Plan policies cited: Policy D1, Policy H6, Policy T1, Policy T2, Policy A1, Policy 2 Fortune Green and West Hampstead Neighbourhood Plan, Policy D6 London Plan, Policy T6 London Plan
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.