Planning appeal decision
Land to the West of Osney Lodge Farm, Byers Lane, Godstone, Surrey
Planning appeal 3309535 at Land to the West of Osney Lodge Farm, Byers Lane, Godstone, Surrey (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 3 January 2024 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies and its effect on openness of the Green Belt.
change of use of the land to a natural burial ground. Construction of a service hall building associated with the natural burial ground use together with parking, access and landscaping works
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- community-institutional · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Pattison B
- Postcode
- RH9 8JH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies and its effect on openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area with particular regard to the local landscape and the countryside as a whole
- Whether the site is a suitable location for the proposal having regard to local and national planning policy, and the accessibility of the site
- If the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm is not clearly outweighed by the community benefits of providing additional burial space, and therefore very special circumstances do not exist to justify the inappropriate development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CSP1Policy CSP18Policy CSP21Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy TLP40
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 180Paragraph 225
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Allowed25 September 20266006497Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®