Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 March 20233309599

102 Waverley Crescent, ROMFORD, RM3 8AJ

retention of side and rear canopies

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Davis J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers of the host dwelling and the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular reference to outlook

What decided it

The excessive size, poor construction quality, and visual prominence of the rear canopy, particularly its projection beyond neighbouring properties and siting on boundaries, causes unacceptable harm to character and appearance and to neighbours' living conditions.

Plan policies cited: Policy 7, Policy 26

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.