Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 July 20243309731

122 Enbrook Valley, Folkestone, CT20 3NA

rear garden sleeper and decking area. For clarity, the garden contains two levels of decking with sleeper walls and steps constructed of sleepers and decking between, so the description of development relates to both areas of decking and the steps. 4. The

Authority
Folkestone and Hythe District Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Steen A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is an engineering operation and, if so, whether it constitutes development permitted by Article 3 and Class E, Part 1, Schedule 2 of the GPDO

What decided it

The decking closest to the house comprises a raised platform which is excluded from the permitted development rights under Class E, Part 1, Schedule 2 of the GPDO.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.