Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 July 20233309960

The Bungalow Kiln Lane, Brockham, Betchworth, RH3 7LZ

Planning appeal 3309960 at The Bungalow Kiln Lane, Brockham, Betchworth, RH3 7LZ (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 20 July 2023 by Inspector Fort G, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.

Development comprising 33 dwellings along with associated public open space and highways improvements with all matters reserved other than access

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Fort G
Postcode
RH3 7LZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • the effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would secure adequate living conditions for its future occupants, with particular reference to privacy and outlook
  • whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm resulting from the proposal is clearly outweighed by other considerations

What decided it

The substantial Green Belt harm (inappropriateness and harm to openness) was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations, so very special circumstances were not demonstrated.

the substantial weight attached to Green Belt harm (inappropriateness, openness and encroachment) was not clearly outweighed by the considerable but lesser benefits of housing and affordable housing delivery, sustainable construction, open space/biodiversity and other modest benefits, so the appeal was dismissed

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1Policy CS13Policy CS4Policy CS18Policy CS19Policy MOV2Policy ENV22
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 48Paragraph 57Paragraph 63Paragraph 74Paragraph 76Paragraph 104Paragraph 137Paragraph 145Paragraph 147
Judgments
Maximus Networks Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Others [2018] EWHC 1933 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

41 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266013764
    Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266011465
    Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266008528
    Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
  4. Allowed11 September 20266012763
    Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
  5. Dismissed9 September 20266005433
    Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.