Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 October 20233310205

7 Market Place, Romford, RM1 3AB

a 3-storey rear extension over parking area, roof extension, new fenestration and alterations to facilitate conversion to create 6 additional flats

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cryan M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to daylight and sunlight, outlook, and natural ventilation
  • Whether or not the development would lead to an unacceptable increase in demand for on-street car parking

What decided it

The significant harm arising from inadequate daylight, sunlight and outlook for future occupiers, which would conflict with development plan policies and Framework requirements for well-designed places with high standards of amenity, demonstrably outweighed the modest housing benefits.

The modest benefits of six additional dwellings and economic benefits during construction, carrying moderate weight, were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to living conditions for future occupiers, which carried substantial weight in the balance.

Framework references: 125, 189, 200, 202, 126, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy 7 of the 2021 Havering Local Plan, Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy 24 of the 2021 Havering Local Plan, Policy T6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy T6.1 of the London Plan 2021

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.