Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision6 July 20233310269

68 Elliott Avenue, Ruislip, HA4 9LZ

Planning appeal 3310269 at 68 Elliott Avenue, Ruislip, HA4 9LZ (London Borough of Hillingdon) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 6 July 2023 by Inspector Pipe C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the single storey extension to the rear on the character and appearance of existing property and area in general.

Conversion of roof space to habitable use to include a rear dormer with 2 front roof lights and erection of single storey extension to rear

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Pipe C
Postcode
HA4 9LZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the single storey extension to the rear on the character and appearance of existing property and area in general
  • The effect of the single storey extension to the rear on the living conditions of occupiers of No. 70 Elliott Avenue

What decided it

The proposed single storey extension would have an overbearing and overshadowing effect on the living conditions of occupiers of the adjacent property No. 70 Elliott Avenue, conflicting with local plan policies protecting neighbouring amenities.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BE1 of the Hillingdon's A Vision for 2026, Local Plan: Part 1, Strategic Policies (2012)Policy DMHB 11 of the Local Plan: Part 2Policy DMHB 12 of the Local Plan: Part 2Policy DMHD 1 of the Local Plan: Part 2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

418 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266015310
    4 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266011782
    25 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266011268
    364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
  5. Allowed6 October 20266013858
    88 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.