Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed19 July 20233310768

27 Howards Lane, ADDLESTONE, KT15 1ET

first floor extension and ground floor rear and side extensions along with alterations to the fenestration following the demolition of an existing conservatory, single storey extension and garage

Authority
Runnymede Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Pattison B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) and any relevant development plan policies
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether or not the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The fallback position under permitted development rights, which would have greater adverse impacts on the Green Belt's openness than the appeal scheme, provided very special circumstances to justify the proposal.

Framework references: 137, 147, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy EE14

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.