Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 April 20233311051

Land adjacent Egremont House, Edgmond, Newport, Shropshire, TF10 8JW

erection of 7no. dwellings and associated garages

Authority
Telford and Wrekin Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Thompson P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed building, known as 'Egremont House', the setting of the Edgmond Primitive Methodist Church, a non-designated heritage asset, the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Edgmond Conservation Area and whether the proposal is consistent with policies relating to housing in rural areas
  • the effect of the proposed development on the continued use of the multi-use games area adjacent to the site

What decided it

The less than substantial but significant heritage harm to the listed building's setting and the Conservation Area's character, combined with harm to the living conditions of future occupiers and the continued use of the MUGA, outweighed the moderate public benefits of the scheme.

The great weight given to the less than substantial heritage harm and conflict with rural housing policy, together with harm to the MUGA, outweighed the moderate public benefits (affordable housing, S106 contributions, economic and biodiversity benefits), so the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.

Framework references: 197, 199, 200, 202, 203, 182, 57

Plan policies cited: Policy SP3, Policy HO10, Policy HO11, Policy HO5, Policy HO6, Policy BE1, Policy BE4, Policy BE5, Policy BE6, Policy NE3, Policy RES1, Policy RES4

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.