Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld11 November 20243311105

1a Mount Drive, Harrow, HA2 7RW

Planning appeal 3311105 at 1a Mount Drive, Harrow, HA2 7RW (London Borough of Harrow) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 11 November 2024 by Inspector Satheesan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the front porch on the character and appearance of the host building and the area.

Without planning permission, the construction of a single-storey front porch (“Unauthorised Development”); and Without planning permission, the material change of use of the property from C3 dwelling house to HMO (house in multiple occupation) in excess of six persons "Sui Generis" (“Unauthorised use")

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Satheesan R
Postcode
HA2 7RW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the front porch on the character and appearance of the host building and the area
  • The effect of the use of the property as a HMO on the living conditions of current and future occupiers of the HMO, with particular regard to floor space, layout, daylight and outlook
  • The effect of the use of the property as an HMO on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The development fails to provide acceptable living conditions for both HMO occupiers and neighbouring residents, and the front porch harms the character and appearance of the area, contrary to the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy CS1Policy DM1Policy DM26Policy DM30Policy D3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

360 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266013962
    2 Whitefriars Avenue,, Harrow Weald, HA3 5RN
  2. Allowed5 October 20266011608
    6 Mead Close, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 5JN
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266005822
    Former National Grid Site, Marsh Lane, Stanmore, HA7 2SN
  4. Allowed27 August 20266009442
    36 St Kildas Road, Harrow, HA1 1QA
  5. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263355600
    Masons Arms, 75 High Street, Edgware, HA8 7DD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.