Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 February 20233311195

99 Edenfield Road , Rochdale , OL11 5AE

Authority
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hendley D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect on the living conditions of the nearest properties on Viking Street by way of privacy
  • Whether any harm is outweighed by the fallback position and other considerations

What decided it

The unacceptable effect on character and appearance caused by the white UPVC construction and disproportionate size of the dormer, combined with unacceptable loss of privacy to neighbouring properties, which could not be justified by the fallback position.

Plan policies cited: Policy DM1, Policy P3, Rochdale Adopted Core Strategy (2016)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.