Planning appeal decision
Land at TJ's Travel Ltd, Leeds Road, Lofthouse, Wakefield, WF3 3LR
Planning appeal 3311361 at Land at TJ's Travel Ltd, Leeds Road, Lofthouse, Wakefield, WF3 3LR (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 13 October 2023 by Inspector Franks Z, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2023 (‘the Framework’) and any relevant development plan policies.
the material change of use of land to a sui generis coach depot including ancillary offices, toilet and storage uses in converted storage containers; a portable office building; and cleaning/servicing facilities accommodated under a scaffold canopy structure and the erection of a fence and gates
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- employment-industrial · Change of use
- Inspector
- Franks Z
- Postcode
- WF3 3LR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2023 (‘the Framework’) and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of the residents nearby properties
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The combined Green Belt harm (inappropriateness and openness) and harm to residents' living conditions was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations put forward, so very special circumstances did not exist.
the moderate weight given to economic benefits and limited mitigating effect of a landscaping scheme did not clearly outweigh the Green Belt harm and the harm to living conditions of nearby residents, so very special circumstances did not exist
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy N33Policy GP5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 147Paragraph 149
- Judgments
- Burdle v Secretary of State for the Environment [1972] 1 WLR 1207
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed15 October 20266010414Ground Floor, 106 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP
- Dismissed15 October 2026601041384 – 90 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP
- Allowed13 October 20266011132Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Dismissed30 September 202660118272 Rookwood Avenue, Osmondthorpe, Leeds, LS9 0NW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®