Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 June 20233311383

Heatherfield Stables, Redbridge Road, Crossways, DT2 8DY

Planning appeal 3311383 at Heatherfield Stables, Redbridge Road, Crossways, DT2 8DY (Dorset) was dismissed on 27 June 2023 by Inspector Jones M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the site is suitable for the development having regard to the development plan's spatial strategy for the supply of housing, with reference to the accessibility of services and facilities.

Temporary siting of a cabin for five years

Authority
Dorset
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jones M
Postcode
DT2 8DY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the site is suitable for the development having regard to the development plan's spatial strategy for the supply of housing, with reference to the accessibility of services and facilities
  • the effect of the development on the integrity of the Poole Harbour Special Protection Area (the SPA) with reference to nitrates
  • other considerations which may weigh in favour of or against the development, with reference to: whether or not the Council can demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites; the emerging Purbeck Local Plan; and, the personal circumstances of the appellant, with reference to the Public Sector Equalities Duty (the PSED) and the Human Rights Act 1998 (the HRA)

What decided it

The adverse effect on the integrity of the Poole Harbour SPA from nitrates, which had to be given substantial weight under the Habitats Regulations, outweighed all other considerations including the appellant's personal circumstances.

The substantial weight attributed to harm to the integrity of the Poole Harbour SPA outweighed the limited weight of the spatial strategy conflict, the modest housing supply shortfall, the emerging local plan benefits, and the substantial weight given to the appellant's personal circumstances under the HRA and PSED.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SUS1Policy SUS2Policy INT1Policy ENV2Policy HOUS6Policy H4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 80

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

2 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dorset

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266010776
    The Bothey, Clayford, Wimborne, BH21 7BJ
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266014673
    52 St Mary Street, Weymouth, DT4 8BJ
  3. Dismissed22 October 20266012104
    Papushka Fields, Dorchester Rd,, Lytchett Minster, BH16 6FE
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266011513
    Field View Barn, Fishey Lane, West Orchard, SP7 0LQ
  5. Allowed21 October 20266010895
    Land off Dukes Close, Martinstown, DT2 9TU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.