Planning appeal decision
Heatherfield Stables, Redbridge Road, Crossways, DT2 8DY
Planning appeal 3311383 at Heatherfield Stables, Redbridge Road, Crossways, DT2 8DY (Dorset) was dismissed on 27 June 2023 by Inspector Jones M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the site is suitable for the development having regard to the development plan's spatial strategy for the supply of housing, with reference to the accessibility of services and facilities.
Temporary siting of a cabin for five years
- Authority
- Dorset
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Jones M
- Postcode
- DT2 8DY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the site is suitable for the development having regard to the development plan's spatial strategy for the supply of housing, with reference to the accessibility of services and facilities
- the effect of the development on the integrity of the Poole Harbour Special Protection Area (the SPA) with reference to nitrates
- other considerations which may weigh in favour of or against the development, with reference to: whether or not the Council can demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites; the emerging Purbeck Local Plan; and, the personal circumstances of the appellant, with reference to the Public Sector Equalities Duty (the PSED) and the Human Rights Act 1998 (the HRA)
What decided it
The adverse effect on the integrity of the Poole Harbour SPA from nitrates, which had to be given substantial weight under the Habitats Regulations, outweighed all other considerations including the appellant's personal circumstances.
The substantial weight attributed to harm to the integrity of the Poole Harbour SPA outweighed the limited weight of the spatial strategy conflict, the modest housing supply shortfall, the emerging local plan benefits, and the substantial weight given to the appellant's personal circumstances under the HRA and PSED.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SUS1Policy SUS2Policy INT1Policy ENV2Policy HOUS6Policy H4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 80
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Dorset
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed29 October 20266010776The Bothey, Clayford, Wimborne, BH21 7BJ
- Dismissed23 October 2026601467352 St Mary Street, Weymouth, DT4 8BJ
- Dismissed22 October 20266012104Papushka Fields, Dorchester Rd,, Lytchett Minster, BH16 6FE
- Dismissed22 October 20266011513Field View Barn, Fishey Lane, West Orchard, SP7 0LQ
- Allowed21 October 20266010895Land off Dukes Close, Martinstown, DT2 9TU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®