Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 May 20233311559

367 Leatherhead Road, CHESSINGTON, KT9 2NQ

the erection two-storey side, single-storey rear, single storey-front extensions with new porch. rear dormer roof extension with installation of 2 no front rooflights to facilitate loft conversion

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Glassar S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the dwelling and wider area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with disproportionate additions to the original building, and the limited weight that could be attached to acceptable character and appearance is insufficient to clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt required to establish very special circumstances.

Framework references: 137, 148, 149, 150

Plan policies cited: Policy DM5, Policy G2, Policy D3, Policy CS8, Policy DM10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.