Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 April 20233313072

Rivelin Filter Cottage, Manchester Road, Sheffield, S6 5SP

erection of front porch extension and single storey rear extension including rear raised terrace and balustrade (resubmission of 22/01651/FUL)

Authority
Sheffield City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Williamson J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • if the proposed development is inappropriate development, its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the area
  • if the development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations that amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause moderate harm to spatial openness and limited harm to visual openness, and would harm the character and appearance of the original dwelling and area, with these harms not clearly outweighed by other considerations including the fallback position.

Framework references: 130, 137, 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy GE6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.