Planning appeal decision
47 Portsmouth Road, Thames Ditton, Surrey, KT7 0TA
Planning appeal 3313510 at 47 Portsmouth Road, Thames Ditton, Surrey, KT7 0TA (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 24 July 2023 by Inspector Wildsmith D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including on the CA and its setting, and on the setting of the nearby listed Angel Inn and War Memorial.
Demolition of existing buildings on site and erection of a Class E retail unit alongside access, car parking and associated works
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- retail · Unknown
- Inspector
- Wildsmith D
- Postcode
- KT7 0TA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including on the CA and its setting, and on the setting of the nearby listed Angel Inn and War Memorial
- The effect on the living conditions of nearby residents, with particular reference to overbearing impact, and noise and disturbance
- Whether the proposed development would be an effective use of land, and its effect on the vitality and viability of the Thames Ditton and Hinchley Wood local centres
- The effect on the safety and convenience of users of the adjacent highway network, and on sustainable travel options in the area and to the site
- Whether the suggested conditions would satisfactorily address the impacts of the proposed development
What decided it
The less-than-substantial heritage harm to the setting of the Conservation Area and the listed Angel Inn, given great weight, was not outweighed by the moderate-weighted public benefits, compounded by an unacceptable overbearing impact on neighbouring occupiers.
The great weight given to the less-than-substantial harm to the setting of the CA and the listed Angel Inn outweighed the moderate-weighted heritage, social, economic and environmental benefits of the scheme, and this, together with harm to neighbours' living conditions, tipped the balance against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS8Policy CS15Policy CS17Policy CS18Policy CS25Policy DM2Policy DM7Policy DM12Policy DM21
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 48Paragraph 55Paragraph 56Paragraph 81Paragraph 87Paragraph 88Paragraph 90Paragraph 91Paragraph 93Paragraph 106Paragraph 119Paragraph 120Paragraph 174Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed6 October 20266010653Land Rear Of 12-14 New Road, Esher, KT10 9PG
- Allowed3 September 20266007869Wild Flowers, Wren's Hill, Oxshott, KT22 0HN
- Allowed10 August 2026600603331 Stevens Lane, Claygate, Esher, KT10 0TD
- Allowed9 July 202660055521a Carmalt Gardens, Hersham, KT12 5HQ
- Allowed29 May 202660058508-14 Oatlands Drive, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 9JL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®