Planning appeal decision
Former Garden Centre, White Gate Nurseries, Stockwood Hill, Keynsham, Bristol, BS31 2AN
Planning appeal 3313592 at Former Garden Centre, White Gate Nurseries, Stockwood Hill, Keynsham, Bristol, BS31 2AN (Bath and North East Somerset Council) was dismissed on 19 May 2023 by Inspector Davies N, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework).
conversion of existing 5 buildings to form 6 dwellings, with associated parking and internal access road
- Authority
- Bath and North East Somerset Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Davies N
- Postcode
- BS31 2AN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework)
- Whether the site is suitable for the proposed development having regard to the spatial strategy of the development plan and whether the proposed works would constitute re-use or reconstruction of the existing nursery buildings/structures
- The effect of the proposed development upon biodiversity
- The effect of the proposed development upon highway safety and accessibility to sustainable transport
What decided it
The proposal was found to constitute rebuilding rather than conversion, placing it in conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy, compounded by unresolved biodiversity risk and harmful highway safety impacts.
The Inspector found the development plan up-to-date and saw no substantive reason to set aside the housing strategy even allowing for potential benefits such as reuse of a previously developed site, reduced vandalism risk, reduced pressure for countryside housing, good design or employment creation.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DW1Policy RE4Policy RE6Policy SCR6Policy D8Policy NE3Policy NE5Policy D5ePolicy ST1Policy ST7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 174Paragraph 111
- Judgments
- Hibbitt High Court judgement
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bath and North East Somerset
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed19 August 20266005916Parcel 1643 Middle Piece Lane, Burnett, Keynsham, BS31 2ED
- Dismissed9 July 20266008028Blossom Manor, Palmers Lane Tunley, Bath, BA2 0DZ
- Dismissed30 June 20266006198561 Bath Road, Saltford, BS31 3JS
- Allowed13 May 202660013842 Culverhay, Compton Dando, Bristol, BS39 4LQ
- Notice varied and upheld12 May 20263349091Norton Lane Barn Norton Lane, Wellow, Bath, BA2 8QR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®