Planning appeal decision
Bridge House, 1A Bridge Way, Ickenham, UXBRIDGE, UB10 8QR
described on the application form as follows: ‘This application relates to a single storey side extension to the house-at ground level meeting permitted development. The house is a detached 4-bedroom property. The material used in the side extension will match the existing house i.e., matching bricks and double glazing. As the plans show; the side extension will be half the width of the original house and only extending up to the original house. The front parapet will have a maximum height of 3.4m with a fibre glass flat roof
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Hawkins S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's refusal to grant a certificate of lawful use or development for the proposal was well-founded, turning on whether planning permission is granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) at Article 3, Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A
What decided it
The side elevation of the dwelling fronts the highway, and therefore the proposed extension would exceed the limitation in paragraph A.1(e)(ii) of Class A of the GPDO, meaning it cannot be permitted development.
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®