Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 April 20233314015

40 Tudor Road, London, E6 1DR

Planning appeal 3314015 at 40 Tudor Road, London, E6 1DR (London Borough of Newham) was dismissed on 21 April 2023 by Inspector Lock H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host property and the locality.

retrospective application for rear extension, outbuilding in the rear garden and new obscured glass screen for the first floor terrace

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Lock H
Postcode
E6 1DR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host property and the locality
  • The living conditions of neighbouring residents at 38 and 42 Tudor Road, with particular reference to daylight and overshadowing, privacy and outlook

What decided it

The cumulative depth and height of the rear extensions and outbuilding, combined with the necessary privacy screens, create unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions through overbearing impact, privacy loss and overshadowing, and detract from the character and appearance of the host property and locality.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Newham Local Plan 2018 Policy S1Newham Local Plan 2018 Policy SP3Newham Local Plan 2018 Policy SP1Newham Local Plan 2018 Policy SP8Newham Local Plan 2018 Policy S6Newham Local Plan 2018 Policy H1The London Plan 2021 Policy D3The London Plan 2021 Policy D4The London Plan 2021 Policy D1The London Plan 2021 Policy D2The London Plan 2021 Policy D8

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

713 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Newham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266010788
    Costa Coffee, 45 Woodgrange Road, Forest Gate, E7 8BA
  2. Allowed22 October 20266012761
    Land Outside 341 to 353, High Street, Stratford, E15 4QZ
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266014267
    Rear Of 90 Cumberland Road, Plaistow, London, E13 8LQ
  4. Dismissed2 October 20266011081
    239 Barking Road, London, E6 1LB
  5. Allowed18 September 20266011432
    7 Grayling Close, Canning Town, London, E16 4PB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.