Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 June 20233314462

26 Lowgate Street, Eye, IP23 7AS

Planning appeal 3314462 at 26 Lowgate Street, Eye, IP23 7AS (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 5 June 2023 by Inspector Biggers P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surroundings of Lowgate Street.

erection of two storey rear extension, front porch and detached single storey garage/store

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Biggers P
Postcode
IP23 7AS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surroundings of Lowgate Street
  • whether the proposed development would have a detrimental impact on the present and future living conditions of the occupants of the bungalow (Russets) to the rear

What decided it

The scale, mass and height of the proposed extension would be disproportionately large relative to the original cottage and would create an overbearing impact on the neighbouring bungalow Russets, causing unacceptable harm to character and appearance and living conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Mid Suffolk Core Strategy Policy CS5Mid Suffolk Local Plan Policy H18Mid Suffolk Local Plan Policy GP1Mid Suffolk Local Plan Policy H16Eye Neighbourhood Plan Policy EYE16
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 124

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266012038
    The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
  2. Dismissed14 September 20266010281
    1 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
  3. Dismissed8 September 20266010228
    Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
  4. Dismissed2 September 20263359620
    Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278
    Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.