Planning appeal decision
Five Oaks Charlwood Road, Horley, RH6 0AJ
Planning appeal 3314495 at Five Oaks Charlwood Road, Horley, RH6 0AJ (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 16 October 2023 by Inspector Castle S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and its effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.
demolition of existing buildings and erection of 4 no. detached dwellings; revised application further to 5 dwelling refusal under MO/2021/1619
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Castle S
- Postcode
- RH6 0AJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and its effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the development on biodiversity and protected species
- if the proposal would be inappropriate development, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt from the proposed dwellings compared to the existing low-profile rural buildings, combined with the absence of very special circumstances to justify inappropriate development, determined the appeal.
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and purposes, and harm to character and appearance, were not outweighed by the moderate benefit of housing supply, limited economic and social benefits, limited weight for use of previously developed land, and limited environmental benefits; the tilted balance did not apply due to Green Belt protection policies providing a clear reason for refusal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS14Policy CS15Policy ENV15Policy ENV22Policy ENV23Policy ENV24
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 149gParagraph 130Paragraph 180Paragraph 11d(i)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005433Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®