Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 July 20233314559

Land Adjacent to Crossflats Cricket Club, Keighley Road , Bingley, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD16 2ER

Planning appeal 3314559 at Land Adjacent to Crossflats Cricket Club, Keighley Road , Bingley, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD16 2ER (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 24 July 2023 by Inspector Burnham T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with regard to the density of development and the provision of the safety netting and support towers.

The conversion/change of use of an existing A3 structure to form a single residential unit (Plot 5). The formation of a single semidetached house (Plots 6 & 7). The formation of a 3no new terraced houses (Plots 8, 9 & 10). The formation of 2no new detached house; (Plots 11 & 12) as well as all the required parking, access road and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Burnham T
Postcode
BD16 2ER

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with regard to the density of development and the provision of the safety netting and support towers
  • The effect of the safety netting support towers on the setting of the Grade II* listed Ryshworth Hall
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers with regard to the outdoor amenity spaces, any overbearing effect as a result of the safety netting and support towers and any noise and disruption arising from the Cricket Club premises
  • Whether there would be any unacceptable adverse impact on highway safety as a result of the proposal
  • Whether there would be any unacceptable overshadowing or loss of light to the Cricket Club house and pavilion

What decided it

The cumulative significant adverse impacts on character and appearance, living conditions, and heritage setting were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, both under the tilted balance and as a standalone heritage-based reason for refusal.

The adverse impacts (harm to character and appearance, living conditions, and less than substantial harm to the setting of Ryshworth Hall) were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the housing supply and economic benefits, so the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DS1Policy EN3Policy DS5Policy EN8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 196Paragraph 111Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

31 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed15 September 20266010672
    25-27 Kensington Street, Bradford, BD8 9LZ
  2. Dismissed11 August 20266004749
    1 Corn Mill Fold, Bradford, BD6 2HQ
  3. Dismissed21 July 20266008478
    95 Lilycroft Road, Bradford, BD9 5AH
  4. Dismissed27 May 20266002874
    1, Chapel Street, Bradford, BD5 0LF
  5. Dismissed7 April 20266004938
    96 Avondale Road, Shipley, West Yorkshire, BD18 4QY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.