Planning appeal decision
31 Broomfield, Adel, Leeds, LS16 6AE
electric gates at the end of the drive
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Senior H
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The solid design and height of the gates created a prominent and intrusive feature that harmed the character and appearance of the area, conflicting with development plan policies and NPPF design principles, with no justification outweighing this conflict.
Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds City Council Core Strategy (2019), Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review (2006), Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review (2006), Policy N25 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review (2006), Policy HDG1 of Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2012)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®