Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 November 20233315713

Harbour Lane street works, Harbour Lane, Rochdale, OL16 3LQ

5G telecoms installation: H3G 20m street pole and additional equipment cabinets

Authority
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Dring G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting and appearance on the character and appearance of the area
  • if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The appellant failed to provide adequate evidence that alternative sites had been properly assessed and that the proposed siting was the most suitable option, combined with the finding that the monopole would cause visual harm to the character and appearance of the area.

Framework references: 117

Plan policies cited: Policy P1, Policy P3, Policy DM1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.