Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld19 February 20243316190

22 Brackley, Sulgrave, Washington, NE37 3DP

Planning appeal 3316190 at 22 Brackley, Sulgrave, Washington, NE37 3DP (Sunderland City Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 19 February 2024 by Inspector Gray E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the living conditions of occupants of the building with particular regard to the provision of indoor space and privacy.

Without planning permission, the material change of use of the land from use purposes incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse to use as a self-contained dwelling, including use for short term lets and holiday lets

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Gray E
Postcode
NE37 3DP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of occupants of the building with particular regard to the provision of indoor space and privacy
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring residents with particular regard to noise and disturbance, and odours
  • the provision of cycle and vehicle parking in the area
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area

What decided it

The development would create unacceptable living conditions for future occupants due to insufficient internal floor space and lack of privacy, and would cause unacceptable adverse effects on neighbouring residents through noise and disturbance, contrary to the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BH1Policy HS1Policy ST3Policy H7

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

15 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sunderland

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed25 September 20266004934
    105 Wellburn Road, Washington, NE37 1DD
  2. Planning permission granted15 September 20263368726
    47 Roker Park Road, Sunderland, SR6 9PL
  3. Dismissed14 September 20266011401
    1 Rothbury, Sunderland, SR2 0BE
  4. Dismissed9 July 20266006595
    Filebase Limited, Filebase House, 3A Stephenson Road, Stephenson, Washington, NE37 3HW
  5. Dismissed30 April 20266003819
    15 Waterloo Place, Sunderland, SR1 3HT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.