Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed29 June 20233316428

Land (Canal) Adjacent To The Old Orchard, Grand Union Canal Park Lane , Harefield, UB9 6DD

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Sabu R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council behaved unreasonably with respect to the reason for refusal, causing the Applicant to incur unnecessary or wasted expense

What decided it

The Council behaved unreasonably by determining the section 73 application on the mistaken basis that the permission was temporary, causing the Applicant to incur additional costs defending the reason for refusal.

Judgments cited: John Leslie Finney v Welsh Ministers and others [2019] EWCA Civ 1868; Mikael Armstrong v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities & Cornwall Council [2023] EWHC 142 (KB)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.