®Planning appeal decision
Yews Green Farm, Yew Green, Cockin Lane, Bradford, BD14 6PX
Planning appeal 3316593 at Yews Green Farm, Yew Green, Cockin Lane, Bradford, BD14 6PX (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 27 November 2024 by Inspector Cullen F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Construction of two new buildings (one residential dwelling, one ancillary building); conversion of barn to form two dwellings with raising of eaves and four dormer window extensions on south elevation
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Cullen F
- Postcode
- BD14 6PX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the development on the landscape character of the area
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, are clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness and landscape character, which cannot be clearly outweighed by the modest housing and economic benefits, and Green Belt protection policies provide a clear reason for refusal notwithstanding the lack of five-year housing land supply.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to openness and landscape character was not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of one dwelling and two dwellings respectively and associated economic benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1 of the Replacement Unitary Development Plan (2005)Policy EN4 of the Bradford Core Strategy Development Plan Document (2017)Policy DS1 of the Bradford Core Strategy Development Plan Document (2017)Policy DS2 of the Bradford Core Strategy Development Plan Document (2017)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
- Judgments
- Gravesham BC v SSE & O'Brien [1983] JPL 306
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed22 October 20266013460Overgate Croft Cottage, Cocking Lane, Addingham, LS29 0QG
- Dismissed20 October 20266012872Keepers Cottege, North Bank Road, Bingley, Bradford, BD16 1UH
- Dismissed15 September 20266008465Land at Moorhouse Lane, Oxenhope, Keighley, BD22 9RY
- Allowed10 August 20266002654Land Adjacent to Brackenwood, Hebers Ghyll Drive, Ilkley, LS29 9QQ
- Notice varied and upheld28 July 20263375503167 - 169 North Wing, Bradford, BD3 0EL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.