Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed9 May 20233317047

Windrush, Acacia Park Crescent, Rawdon, Bradford, BD10 0PJ

Planning appeal 3317047 at Windrush, Acacia Park Crescent, Rawdon, Bradford, BD10 0PJ (Leeds City Council) was allowed on 9 May 2023 by Inspector Burnham T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

Removal of Existing Above Ground Swimming Pool and Replacement with Oak Framed Open Car Port at the Lower level

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Burnham T
Postcode
BD10 0PJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Rawdon Cragg Wood Conservation Area

What decided it

The car port, being a reasonably modest and sensibly sized structure positioned close to and beneath the large dwelling, could be regarded as a limited extension that would not form a disproportionate addition over and above the size of the original building, and would not detract from the Conservation Area's heritage significance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy N33Policy P10Policy P11Policy GP5Policy N19Policy BD6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

44 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012772
    Lovell Park Hub, Wintoun Street, Leeds, LS7 1DA
  2. Dismissed20 October 20266012588
    Index House, 70 Burley Road, Leeds, LS3 1JX
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266012022
    5 Robins Grove, Rothwell, Leeds, LS26 0LE
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266010100
    Vacant Site, Ings Grove, Guiseley, LS20 9FR
  5. Dismissed15 October 20266010414
    Ground Floor, 106 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.