Planning appeal decision
Land to the Rear of 18 Freelands Road, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 2ND
Planning appeal 3317170 at Land to the Rear of 18 Freelands Road, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 2ND (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 17 January 2024 by Inspector Leonard S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
erection of a single storey detached dwelling including ancillary refuse and cycle stores and associated landscaping and parking, following demolition of the existing buildings
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Leonard S
- Postcode
- KT11 2ND
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers with particular regard to indoor living space
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers with particular regard to outdoor living space
- whether the proposal makes appropriate provision for affordable housing
- the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the TBHSPA
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area, arising from the incongruous design and cramped layout of the proposal, outweighed the modest benefits of housing delivery and affordable housing contribution when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.
The modest benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing contribution, and economic and social benefits were afforded moderate weight, but were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and the failure to achieve the social objective of fostering well-designed and beautiful places.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS10Policy CS17Policy CS21Policy DM2Policy DM10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 57Paragraph 60Paragraph 65Paragraph 70Paragraph 135
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1982) JLP 37
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 October 2026601339623 Avondale Avenue, Esher, KT10 0DB
- Dismissed21 October 2026601332769 Alexandra Road, Thames Ditton, KT7 0QS
- Dismissed16 October 20266008605Pavement Outside Tesco Stores Ltd, 108 - 118 Walton Road East Molesey, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
- Dismissed16 October 20266008598Pavement Outside Tesco Ltd, 108 – 118 Walton Road, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
- Allowed14 October 20266009254Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, KT10 9AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®