Planning appeal decision
Rendy Mead Chew Road, Winford, BRISTOL, BS40 8EZ
a ‘proposed two storey front extension
- Authority
- North Somerset Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Phillips B
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- If the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The disproportionate scale and bulk of the proposed extension, combined with the reduction in Green Belt openness, could not be justified by the modest benefits offered, as very special circumstances were not established.
Framework references: 149
Plan policies cited: Policy DM12, Policy CS6
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®