Planning appeal decision
Land at Cruxton Farm, Cruxton Farm, Cruxton, Dorset, DT2 0BY
Planning appeal 3317593 at Land at Cruxton Farm, Cruxton Farm, Cruxton, Dorset, DT2 0BY (Dorset) was dismissed on 27 September 2023 by Inspector Clark P, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposal on the character, appearance and special qualities of the Dorset Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
Installation of ground-mounted solar panel photovoltaic solar arrays, substations, inverter stations, security fencing, access tracks, landscaping and other associated works
- Authority
- Dorset
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- utilities-energy · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Clark P
- Postcode
- DT2 0EB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effects of the proposal on the character, appearance and special qualities of the Dorset Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
- The effects of the proposal on the recreational benefit of the Macmillan Way
- The contribution which the development proposed would make to the accepted national need for renewable energy and the cost of, and scope for meeting the need for it in some other way
- Any other benefits or disbenefits to be weighed in the planning balance
What decided it
The Secretary of State's finding of great-weight harm to the Dorset AONB, combined with unmitigated harm to the Macmillan Way, meant the case did not demonstrate the exceptional circumstances required to justify major development within the AONB.
Significant weight to renewable energy benefits, moderate weight to biodiversity net gain, and limited weight to temporary nature and economic benefits were outweighed by great weight harm to the AONB, moderate weight harm to the Macmillan Way, and limited weight harm to agricultural productivity, tipping the balance against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- ENV1(i)COM7(v)ENV10(iii)COM11(i)ENV8ENV2(vi)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 48Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 158Paragraph 163Paragraph 176Paragraph 177Paragraph 182Paragraph 183
- Judgments
- Midcounties Co-operative Ltd v Wyre Forest DC [2009] EWHC 964; Hubert v Carmarthenshire CC [2015] EWHC 2327 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Dorset
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed29 October 20266010776The Bothey, Clayford, Wimborne, BH21 7BJ
- Dismissed23 October 2026601467352 St Mary Street, Weymouth, DT4 8BJ
- Dismissed22 October 20266012104Papushka Fields, Dorchester Rd,, Lytchett Minster, BH16 6FE
- Dismissed22 October 20266011513Field View Barn, Fishey Lane, West Orchard, SP7 0LQ
- Allowed21 October 20266010895Land off Dukes Close, Martinstown, DT2 9TU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®