128 Pine Gardens, Ruislip, HA4 9TH

Planning appeal 3317871 at 128 Pine Gardens, Ruislip, HA4 9TH (London Borough of Hillingdon) was allowed on 29 October 2024 by Inspector Hawkins S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Council's refusal of the LDC application was well-founded, turning on whether planning permission is granted for the proposal by Article 3, Schedule 2, Part 1, Classes B and C of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).

Hip to gable conversion, box dormer to rear and provision of two roof lights on front roof slope

Authority: London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type: ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Householder developments
Inspector: Hawkins S
Postcode: HA4 9TH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the Council's refusal of the LDC application was well-founded, turning on whether planning permission is granted for the proposal by Article 3, Schedule 2, Part 1, Classes B and C of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended)

What decided it

The party wall was found to be within the curtilage of the dwelling on the basis of its physical and functional relationship with the dwelling, and the proposal complied with all relevant limitations and conditions of GPDO Classes B and C.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments: Methuen-Campbell v Walters [1979] 1 QB 525; HM Attorney-General ex rel Sutcliffe & Rouse & Hughes v Calderdale BC [1983] JPL 310; McAlpine v SSE [1995] JPL B43

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

389 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

Dismissed27 October 20266015310
4 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
Dismissed27 October 20266009856
18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
Dismissed21 October 20266011782
25 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
Dismissed19 October 20266011268
364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
Allowed6 October 20266013858
88 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.