Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed24 January 20243318125

Belfield Lawn, Belfield Mill Lane, Rochdale, OL16 3AY

Planning appeal 3318125 at Belfield Lawn, Belfield Mill Lane, Rochdale, OL16 3AY (Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 24 January 2024 by Inspector Moulton E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the setting of Belfield Bridge, a Grade II listed building, and the significance of the Rochdale Canal, a non-designated heritage asset.

the removal of the existing 20m pole supporting 3no. antennas. The installation of new replacement 20m monopole supporting 12no. new antennas, 3no. transmission dishes and 36no. RRU's behind the antennas. Installation of 2no. cabinets within compound on new concrete base, together with additional ancillary development thereto, including 2no. GPS modules

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Moulton E
Postcode
OL16 2UB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the setting of Belfield Bridge, a Grade II listed building, and the significance of the Rochdale Canal, a non-designated heritage asset
  • The integrity of the Rochdale Canal SSSI and SAC

What decided it

The screening effect of the intervening tree belt meant the proposed monopole would not be visually prominent in views from the listed building and canal, and a CEMP condition would adequately mitigate construction-phase ecological risks.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P1Policy P2Policy P3Policy DM1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205Paragraph 209Paragraph 175Paragraph 16

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

71 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266014994
    19 Town House Road, Littleborough, Rochdale, OL15 9BG
  2. Dismissed25 September 20266013635
    22 Hawthorn Road, Rochdale, OL11 5JQ
  3. Dismissed2 September 20266004977
    77 Long Street, Middleton, M24 6UN
  4. Allowed30 July 20266005921
    Hollingworth Heights, Peanock Lane, Littleborough, OL15 0AD
  5. Dismissed18 June 20266005050
    Harwood Street Garage, Harwood Street, Littleborough, Rochdale, OL15 8NA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.