Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 October 20233318492

Land Rear of 230-236 Hornchurch Road, Hornchurch, RM11 1QB

Planning appeal 3318492 at Land Rear of 230-236 Hornchurch Road, Hornchurch, RM11 1QB (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 2 October 2023 by Inspector Jarvis P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the impact of the proposal on the character and appearance of the street scene and wider area.

Redevelopment of land to provide new two storey building comprising two self-contained apartments (2 x two bed) together with associated works including new vehicle parking provision, hard / soft landscaping, amenity space and secure refuse and cycling storage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jarvis P
Postcode
RM11 1QB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the impact of the proposal on the character and appearance of the street scene and wider area
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of 1a Purbeck Road, with respect in particular to loss of outlook

What decided it

The harmful impacts on character and appearance and on neighbouring residential amenity (loss of outlook) were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the moderate positive weight given to the housing contribution in the context of under-delivery.

The benefits of housing delivery and making good use of an under-used site were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and the unacceptable loss of outlook to neighbouring residents.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
HLP Policy 7HLP Policy 26HLP Policy 3London Plan Policy D3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

414 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed5 August 20263362455
    10 Avenue Road, Harold Wood, Romford, RM3 0SU
  2. Dismissed5 August 20263354668
    145v Turpin Avenue, , Romford, Havering, RM5 2LU
  3. Unknown4 August 20263360523
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  4. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263360522
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  5. Dismissed4 August 20263359688
    30 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.