Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 November 20233318617

16 Seely Road, Tooting, London, SW17 9QR

Planning appeal 3318617 at 16 Seely Road, Tooting, London, SW17 9QR (London Borough of Merton) was dismissed on 16 November 2023 by Inspector Naylor R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Effect of the proposal on living conditions for potential occupiers.

rear single story extension under permitted development. Change of use from C3 dwelling houses one unit to C3 dwelling house two units both with external amenities at rear

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Naylor R
Postcode
SW17 9QR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Effect of the proposal on living conditions for potential occupiers
  • Effect on the supply of family housing
  • Parking provision
  • Character and appearance of the area and the host property
  • Living conditions for existing nearby residents
  • Waste provision

What decided it

The proposal fails to meet minimum space standards for future occupiers, results in unacceptable loss of family housing without re-provision, and lacks adequate mechanisms to secure car-free and cycle parking compliance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy D6London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D4London Plan Policy T6London Plan Policy T5London Plan Policy H2London Plan Policy SI7London Plan Policy SI8Merton Core Planning Strategy Policy CS14Merton Core Planning Strategy Policy CS20Merton Core Planning Strategy Policy CS17Merton Sites and Policies Plan Policy DM D2Merton Sites and Policies Plan Policy DM D3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

363 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Merton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed11 March 20263375275
    74A College Road, London, SW19 2BS
  2. Dismissed29 January 20263362545
    26 Marlowe Square , London, CR4 1DT
  3. Dismissed22 December 20253371051
    Development Site Between 6 And 8 Bordesley Road, Morden, SM4 5LR
  4. Dismissed18 November 20253368173
    The Trafalgar, 23 High Path, Colliers Wood, Merton, London, SW19 2JY
  5. Dismissed20 October 20253367044
    34-40 Morden Road, South Wimbledon, London, SW19 3BJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.