Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 March 20243319210

Holly Court, 28 St Andrews Road, Plaistow, Newham, E13 8QD

creation of two storey roof extension to provide 3x1 bedroom flats, 1x2 bedroom flat, 1x3 bedroom flat, associated building improvements and landscaping

Authority
London Borough of Newham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Harding C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby residential properties with particular regard to outlook and daylight
  • whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to private outdoor space
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for the storage of waste and recycling

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to character and appearance caused by the incongruent scale of the building within the uniform terraced street context, combined with the failure to provide private outdoor space for future occupiers and unresolved concerns about daylight harm to adjacent properties, outweighed the moderate benefits of additional housing supply and efficient brownfield use.

Framework references: 60, 12

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy D1, London Plan Policy D3, London Plan Policy D4, London Plan Policy D6, London Plan Policy D8, London Plan Policy S17, Newham Plan Policy S1, Newham Plan Policy SP1, Newham Plan Policy SP2, Newham Plan Policy SP3, Newham Plan Policy SP8, Newham Plan Policy H1, Newham Plan Policy INF3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.