Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld29 May 20253319487

101 Greenland Crescent, SOUTHALL, UB2 5ES

Without planning permission: The material change of use of the rear garden outbuilding to use as a separate dwellinghouse

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
King T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the breach of planning control (change of use of the outbuilding to a separate dwellinghouse) commenced more than four years before the enforcement notice was issued and has continued since (ground (d))
  • Whether the compliance period of three months is unreasonably short (ground (g))

What decided it

The conflicted and imprecise evidence provided by the appellant, particularly Mr Basi's contradictory statements about the outbuilding's use, prevented the appellant from discharging the burden of proof required to establish four years of continuous residential use prior to the enforcement notice.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.