Planning appeal decision
Coombers Minor Partridge Lane, Newdigate, Dorking, RH5 5EE
Planning appeal 3319709 at Coombers Minor Partridge Lane, Newdigate, Dorking, RH5 5EE (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 5 December 2023 by Inspector James A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework.
erection of 2 No. dwellings following demolition of existing non-agricultural buildings
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- James A
- Postcode
- RH5 5EE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on protected species and their habitats
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness and is not justified by very special circumstances, as the identified benefits do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, character and appearance, highway safety, and biodiversity.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with harm to character and appearance, highway safety, and insufficient information on protected species, was not outweighed by the social and economic benefits of providing two dwellings and contributing to housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS14 of the Mole Valley Core Strategy October 2009Policy ENV22 of the Mole Valley Local Plan October 2000Policy CS15 of the Core StrategyPolicy ENV15 of the Local PlanPolicy MOV2 of the Local Plan
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 174
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005433Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®