Planning appeal decision
Land at Warwickshire Police Headquarters, Woodcote Lane, Leek Wootton, Warwick, Warwickshire, CV35 7QA
Planning appeal 3319752 at Land at Warwickshire Police Headquarters, Woodcote Lane, Leek Wootton, Warwick, Warwickshire, CV35 7QA (Warwick District Council) was allowed on 24 May 2024 by Inspector Lee S, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The principle of development and compliance with the development plan.
for up to 83no. dwellings (including affordable housing), access, internal roads and footpaths, public open space, landscaping, drainage and other associated works and infrastructure (all matters of detail reserved except for the vehicular access to the site)
- Authority
- Warwick District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Lee S
- Postcode
- CV35 7QA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The principle of development and compliance with the development plan
- The effect of the development on the settings of Woodcote House and the Leek Wootton Conservation Area (LWCA) and the effect on the non-designated locally important park and garden
- The effect of the development on highway safety and the efficient operation of the transport network
- Whether there are any material considerations that would outweigh any conflict with the development plan
What decided it
The public benefits of the scheme, principally housing delivery (including 40% affordable housing) and support for Leek Wootton's growth village status, were found to outweigh the less than substantial heritage harm and the moderately-weighted conflict with the site allocation policy, within a tilted balance triggered by the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.
The significant benefits of housing delivery, including affordable housing and economic benefits, outweighed the less than substantial heritage harm to Woodcote House's setting, the Conservation Area and the non-designated heritage asset, and outweighed the moderately-weighted conflict with Policy DS22 and LWNP policies LW4/LW5, such that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits under the tilted balance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS22Policy DS11Policy DS4Policy DS4(e)Policy H1Policy H10Policy HE1Policy HE3Policy TR1Policy TR2Policy TR3Policy H2Policy H4Policy HS1Policy HS6Policy DM1Policy NZC1Policy NZC2A-CPolicy NZC3Policy NDZ1Policy LW4Policy LW5Policy LW10Policy LW11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 49Paragraph 57Paragraph 77Paragraph 83Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 186Paragraph 205Paragraph 208Paragraph 209Paragraph 214
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd vs the Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust v Harborough District Council v Leicestershire County Council 2023 EWHC 263 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Warwick
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed2 September 20266007651Land to the South of Harbury Lane, Warwick, CV34 7BR
- Allowed18 August 20266002759Land South of, Westwood Heath Road, Coventry, CV4 8LG
- Allowed21 July 20266007706Valley House, Valley Lane, Lapworth, B94 6HB
- Allowed13 July 20266003642The Three Horseshoes, Spring Hill, Bubbenhall, CV8 3BD
- Allowed15 May 20266004949Kenilworth Road, Old Milverton, Warwick, Warwickshire, CV32 6QS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®